What's the impact of predictive AI in the health care setting?

Findings underscore the need to track individuals affected by machine learning predictions

5:00 AM

Author | Karin Eskenazi

red hair woman looking at screen of computer in white coat
Getty Images

Models built on machine learning in health care can be victims of their own success, according to researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine and the University of Michigan.

The study assessed the impact of implementing predictive models on the subsequent performance of those and other models.

Their findings—that using the models to adjust how care is delivered can alter the baseline assumptions that the models were “trained” on, often for worse—were detailed in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“We wanted to explore what happens when a machine learning model is deployed in a hospital and allowed to influence physician decisions for the overall benefit of patients,” said first and corresponding author Akhil Vaid, M.D., clinical instructor of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine, part of the Department of Medicine at Icahn Mount Sinai. 

For example, we sought to understand the broader consequences when a patient is spared from adverse outcomes like kidney damage or mortality. AI models possess the capacity to learn and establish correlations between incoming patient data and corresponding outcomes, but use of these models, by definition, can alter these relationships. Problems arise when these altered relationships are captured back into medical records.”

The study simulated critical care scenarios at two major health care institutions, the Mount Sinai Health System in New York and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, analyzing 130,000 critical care admissions. The researchers investigated three key scenarios:

1. Model retraining after initial use

Current practice suggests retraining models to address performance degradation over time.

Retraining can improve performance initially by adapting to changing conditions, but the Mount Sinai study shows it can paradoxically lead to further degradation by disrupting the learned relationships between presentation and outcome.

2. Creating a new model after one has already been in use

Following a model’s predictions can save patients from adverse outcomes such as sepsis.

However, death may follow sepsis, and the model effectively works to prevent both. Any new models developed in the future for prediction of death will now also be subject to upset relationships as before. 

Since we don't know the exact relationships between all possible outcomes, any data from patients with machine-learning influenced care may be inappropriate to use in training further models.

3. Concurrent use of two predictive models

If two models make simultaneous predictions, using one set of predictions renders the other obsolete. Therefore, predictions should be based on freshly gathered data, which can be costly or impractical.

“Our findings reinforce the complexities and challenges of maintaining predictive model performance in active clinical use,” says co-senior author Karandeep Singh, M.D., associate professor of Learning Health Sciences, Internal Medicine, Urology, and Information at the University of Michigan.

“Model performance can fall dramatically if patient populations change in their makeup. However, agreed-upon corrective measures may fall apart completely if we do not pay attention to what the models are doing—or more properly, what they are learning from.”  

“We should not view predictive models as unreliable,” said co-senior author Girish Nadkarni, M.D., M.P.H., Irene and Dr. Arthur M. Fishberg Professor of Medicine at Icahn Mount Sinai, director of The Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine and system chief of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine.

“Instead, it's about recognizing that these tools require regular maintenance, understanding, and contextualization. Neglecting their performance and impact monitoring can undermine their effectiveness. We must use predictive models thoughtfully, just like any other medical tool. Learning health systems must pay heed to the fact that indiscriminate use of, and updates to, such models will cause false alarms, unnecessary testing, and increased costs.”

“We recommend that health systems promptly implement a system to track individuals impacted by machine learning predictions, and that the relevant governmental agencies issue guidelines,” said Vaid.

“These findings are equally applicable outside of health care settings and extend to predictive models in general. As such, we live in a model-eat-model world where any naively deployed model can disrupt the function of current and future models, and eventually render itself useless.”

The remaining authors are Ashwin Sawant, M.D.; Mayte Suarez-Farinas, Ph.D.; Juhee Lee, M.D.; Sanjeev Kaul, MD; Patricia Kovatch, BS; Robert Freeman, RN; Joy Jiang, BS; Pushkala Jayaraman, MS; Zahi Fayad, PhD; Edgar Argulian, MD; Stamatios Lerakis, M.D.; Alexander W Charney, M.D., Ph.D.; Fei Wang, Ph.D.; Matthew Levin, M.D., Ph.D.; Benjamin Glicksberg, Ph.D.; Jagat Narula, M.D., Ph.D.; and Ira Hofer, M.D.

Paper cited: “Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Predictive Models in Health Care Settings: A Simulation Study.” Annals of Internal Medicine. DOI: 10.7326/M23-0949


More Articles About: All Research Topics
Health Lab word mark overlaying blue cells
Health Lab

Explore a variety of health care news & stories by visiting the Health Lab home page for more articles.

Media Contact Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe
Featured News & Stories stethoscope blue yellow
Health Lab
New drug could help those with CAH reduce the use of corticosteroids
Michigan Medicine researchers discover that a new drug could help those with CAH, or congenital adrenal hyperplasia, reduce the use of corticosteroids. 
cancer cell blue yellow
Health Lab
Accessibility issues in cancer care
Researchers at the University of Michigan are finding that many patients may be encountering significant barriers to cancer care, even from their first phone call to a clinic.
orange background, blue skull, brain maze inside large brain and person with white coat looking at it with a magnifying glass
Health Lab
Uncovering mysteries of the developing brain
The ABCD study, a long-term study of the brains of thousands of young people from preteen to late teen years, is revealing important insights into behavior and mental health.
apple in hand of doctor with white coat and stethoscope facing frontward, neck down, and green plant with sunlight behind it from window coming through on white windows sill
Health Lab
Fewer than 1 in 4 patients receive dietary counseling after a heart attack
Although diet is the leading contributor to premature death from heart disease in the United States, fewer than one-quarter of people who undergo major heart events receive dietary counseling in the aftermath, a study finds.
white blood cell with some blue on black background artistic looking
Health Lab
White blood cell “nets” could be early warning sign of major immunotherapy complication
When white blood cells, meant to protect the body from infection, are overly activated, they eject their DNA into nets, further disrupting the immune system and making patients more likely to develop a potentially severe reaction to immunotherapy.
pills floating blue pink dark background physician in middle looking at chart white coat scrubs
Health Lab
Better medical record-keeping needed to fight antibiotic overuse, studies suggest
Efforts to reduce overuse of antibiotics may be hampered by incomplete medical records that don’t show the full reasons for prescriptions.