Genetic Testing Doesn't Cause Undue Worry for Breast Cancer Patients

Newer genetic tests introduce more ambiguity, but a new study finds patients are not overreacting to uncertain results.

11:00 AM

Author | Nicole Fawcett

Genetic testing for breast cancer has become more complex. Newer tests now evaluate a panel of multiple genes, compared to older tests looking only at BRCA genes.

The new complexity often brings more uncertainty about the results. But, a new study finds that these more extensive tests are not causing patients to worry more about their cancer risk.

LISTEN UP: Add the new Michigan Medicine News Break to your Alexa-enabled device, or subscribe to our daily audio updates on iTunes, Google Play and Stitcher.

"Genetic testing is becoming increasingly more complex, but increasingly more precise. This has led to some ambiguity in test results. The challenge is incorporating this information into the treatment decision without causing unnecessary worry," says lead study author Steven J. Katz, M.D., MPH, professor of general medicine and of health management and policy at the University of Michigan.

A variant of unknown significance

Initially, genetic testing for breast cancer focused exclusively on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Now, newer multigene panel tests look for abnormalities in a dozen or more different genes that play some role in breast cancer risk. By testing more genes, it's more likely a patient will have a positive test or a variant of unknown significance — in other words, something is out of the ordinary but doctors will not know how that impacts cancer risk.

SEE ALSO: Decision Support Tool Boosts Genetic Testing Knowledge in Breast Cancer Patients

The concern is that this greater variation could lead patients to worry too much about their risk of breast cancer recurring when the genetic testing results are ambiguous.

Researchers surveyed 1,063 women treated for early stage breast cancer who had received genetic testing between 2013-2015, the period in which panel testing became more popular. About 60 percent of the patients were tested only for BRCA1 and BRCA2, while 40 percent had the multigene panel test. Patients were asked how much and how often they worried about their cancer coming back and the impact that worry had on their life.

Overall, 11 percent of patients reported that cancer worry had a high impact on their life and 15 percent worried often or almost always. Neither the impact nor the frequency of worry varied substantially based on the type of genetic testing or the test results. The study is published in JCO Precision Oncology.

MORE FROM MICHIGAN: Sign up for our weekly newsletter

"These findings are reassuring," Katz says. "We found that patients did not overreact whether they got the newer panel testing or BRCA-only testing, and they did not overreact to the test results. Their future cancer worry was not different whether they had a negative test or variant of unknown significance."

Genetic counseling

Virtually all of the patients surveyed received some form of genetic counseling. 

"Genetic counseling is essential to maximize the benefit of testing for patients and their families," says senior study author Allison W. Kurian, M.D., M.Sc., associate professor of medicine and of health research and policy at Stanford University. "But timely counseling after diagnosis of breast cancer is increasingly a challenge because more patients are getting tested and the results are more complex."


More Articles About:

Lab Report Breast cancer Genetic Testing Cancer and Genetics Cancer: Cancer Types
Health Lab word mark overlaying blue cells

Health Lab

Explore thousands of health news & research stories by visiting the Health Lab homepage for more.

Media Contact

University Hospital at U-M Health in the spring with flowering trees in foreground and Survival Flight helicopter visible

Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe

Featured News & Stories

Three people stand arm in arm with backs to camera studying a wall of family mementos
Health Lab

Online resources and coaching helped people seek genetic testing for cancer

New study from researchers at the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center showed an online resource and phone-based coaching both helped increase rates of genetic testing.
pattern up close sequencing gene navy yellow
Health Lab

Comprehensive DNA sequencing reveals hidden drivers of cancer

Two research papers describe how long-read nanopore sequencing can detect alterations in cancer cells that might be missed by conventional sequencing.
Health Lab

Liver cancer can be preventable. Do you know the treatable risk factors?

Learn about the risks of chronic liver disease, the treatable liver disease factors and how rates of liver cancer have increased.
Health Lab

Prostate cancer and hereditary risk: A doctor explains the connection

Some genetic mutations linked to breast cancer also can affect men, but in a different way. A Michigan Medicine urologist explains the connection.
microbes inside gut yellow
Health Lab

New oral nanomedicine boosts effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies

University of Michigan researchers developed an oral drug that can increase the ability of T cells to attack tumors. The drug uses the microbial metabolite 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, which is derived from dietary fiber.
Health Lab Podcast in brackets with a background with a dark blue translucent layers over cells
Health Lab Podcast

Navigating Perimenopause and Menopause

To celebrate Health Lab’s 10 year milestone, Health Lab recently hosted its the first Health Lab Live Show, which brought a Health Lab article to life by interviewing experts on stage in front of a live audience. Here, John Randolph, M.D., a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist at Michigan Medicine, discusses hormones, hormone replacement therapy, perimenopause, menopause and so much more.