Medicaid work rules are coming; a top researcher recommends actions to take now

These key steps for health care organizations, state governments and community groups could keep people from losing Medicaid coverage if they qualify

3:18 PM

Author | Kara Gavin

graphic of heart in background and umbrellas above yellow red brown white
Michigan Medicine

This story was originally published by the Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation at the University of Michigan. 

With just over a year to go until low-income people covered by Medicaid expansion in 40 states must start verifying they’re working, or exempt from work requirements, a University of Michigan health care researcher says there isn’t a moment to waste.

Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P., lays out key actions that states, health care providers and organizations, community groups and researchers should take to keep people from losing Medicaid coverage if they actually qualify.

Ayanian heads the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation and its team evaluating the expansion of Medicaid in Michigan under the Healthy Michigan Plan.

Listen to Ayanian discuss this topic in a NEJM podcast

He wrote the new piece in response to the Medicaid-related components of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law in July 2025. Most states will have to comply by January 2027.

For example, he writes:

  • State agencies need to prepare systems that can automatically verify someone’s work status based on payroll and tax data, and their health status based on Medicaid records, to reduce the chance that someone will lose their coverage because they don’t or can’t submit proof that they’re doing one of the approved community engagement activities (working, studying, volunteering) or are unable to do so for medical or caregiving reasons.
  • States also need to communicate clearly, through multiple channels and well in advance, about what individuals will need to do to keep their coverage, and how to get support.

    Doctors and clinics will need clear guidance from state Medicaid agencies on how to verify that someone’s health conditions are serious enough to prevent them from working, and thus enable them to keep their Medicaid health coverage if they aren’t working, studying, or volunteering at least 80 hours per month.

    “Many people who haven’t qualified as disabled through the Social Security Administration still face major health barriers to work, and their physicians and other providers need a pathway for determining and certifying they are medically ‘frail’ and should thus be exempt  from work requirements under the new law,” said Ayanian, a primary care physician at U-M Health and a professor of internal medicine at the U-M Medical School who holds joint appointments in the School of Public Health and Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy.

  • Health care organizations, from freestanding community clinics to major health care systems, need to prepare to support their patients who have significant medical needs, by helping them understand and comply with the law’s requirements.
  • Researchers need to prepare now to evaluate the impacts of the work requirements to inform policymakers through objective evidence.

    This evaluation will be made harder, Ayanian says, because states are barred from conducting gold-standard randomized controlled studies of the impacts of work requirements, by randomly exempting some Medicaid participants and seeing how they fare compared with those subject to the requirements.

In his piece, Ayanian also lays out some key facts about Medicaid and its enrollees, including Census data about what percentage are already working even in the absence of work requirements (44% full time, 20% part time), and what percentage are caregiving (12%), attending school (7%), retired or unable to find work (8%) or too ill or disabled to work (10%).

To qualify for Medicaid in the 40 states and the District of Columbia that have expanded eligibility and are subject to the OBBBA’s work requirement rules, a person can make no more than 138% of the federal poverty level.

That’s about $21,600 a year for an individual, while a couple can make no more than $29,187 a year, and a family of four can have an income of no more than $44,367 a year.

That works out to a wage of about $10.40 an hour for someone working 40 hours a week every week of the year.

Learn more about U-M research on Medicaid, and the evaluation of the Healthy Michigan Plan. 

Listen to an audio interview with Ayanian.

Paper cited: "Protecting Medicaid Enrollees with Chronic Conditions amid Work Requirements," New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2508966 


More Articles About:

Medicaid Health Insurance value-based insurance
Health Lab word mark overlaying blue cells

Health Lab

Explore thousands of health news & research stories by visiting the Health Lab homepage for more.

Media Contact

University Hospital at U-M Health in the spring with flowering trees in foreground and Survival Flight helicopter visible

Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

In This Story

portrait of Ayanian	John

John Zaven Ayanian, MD, MPP

Professor

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe

Featured News & Stories

Health Lab Podcast in brackets with a background with a dark blue translucent layers over cells
Health Lab Podcast

Major Changes to Medicaid

With eligibility rules for people with lower incomes changing in every state, it’s important to stay up to date, seek trustworthy sources and not fall for misinformation. Read the full article here. The article this episode showcases was originally published Sept. 30 and updated Nov. 6 of 2026. The article will be kept up to date as more details become available, and the link to the full article will be included in the episode description.
Minding memory above a microphone on a blue background
Minding Memory

Giving Voice to Lived Experience in Dementia Research

In this episode, Lauren & Matt talk to Brenda Roberts and Steven Barbieri from the National Council of Dementia Minds. The National Council of Dementia Minds is the first national not-for-profit organization founded and governed by people living with dementia. Its work focuses on education, advocacy, peer support, and changing public perception of what it means to live with dementia. Brenda and Steven talk about the National Council of Dementia Minds, the importance of peer support and education for people living with dementia. They focus on how better understanding the lived experiences of people living with dementia can help shape research, policy, and advocacy.
Medicaid magnifying glass
Health Lab

What’s changing in Medicaid and what can you do?

With eligibility rules for people with lower incomes changing in every state, it’s important to stay up to date, seek trustworthy sources and not fall for misinformation
Minding Memory with a microphone and a shadow of a microphone on a blue background
Minding Memory

Antipsychotic Use in Nursing Homes: Balancing Medication Safety, Policy, and Dementia Care

In this episode, Lauren Gerlach and Matt Davis speak with Theresa Shireman, PhD, Director of the Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research and a Professor of Health Services, Policy and Practice and Epidemiology at the Brown University School of Public Health. Dr. Shireman’s research focuses on pharmaceutical policy, pharmacoepidemiology, health services research, and medication use among vulnerable populations. Dr. Shireman discusses her recent study, "Impact of Federal Antipsychotic Use Policy in Nursing Homes on New Diagnoses for Approved Indications in Dementia Residents," published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. The study examines whether federal policies designed to reduce antipsychotic use in nursing homes were associated with increases in new diagnoses of conditions, such as schizophrenia, that exclude residents from publicly report antipsychotic quality measures. Using an interrupted time-series design, the researchers examined changes following the 2012 National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care and the 2015 addition of antipsychotic use to the Nursing home Five-Star Quality Rating System. They found that neither policy was associated with an increase in new exclusionary diagnossees, challenging concerns that nursing homes were increasingly assigning these diagnoses to circumvent restrictions on antipsychotic use. The conversation also explores the benefits and risks of antipsychotic medications for people living with dementia, including the potential for serious adverse effects such as sedation, falls, stroke, and increased mortality. Dr. Shireman discusses how public reporting and financial incentives can influence prescribing practices,the limitations of using a single quality measure to evaluate nursing home care, and the importance of balancing medication safety and residents’ individual needs. The discussion highlights the need for shared decision-making among clinicians, nursing home staff, residents, and families, as well as greater investment in staffing, resources, and nonpharmacological approaches to improve quality of life for people living with dementia. The transcript for this episode can be found here.
A hand holding a prescription bottle with a dollar bill in it
Health Lab

Top 7 tips for choosing Medicare prescription drug coverage for 2027

Prescription drug coverage through Medicare Advantage and Part D plans in traditional Medicare has changed for 2027, and older adults may not know about programs that could help with costs.
Two older women looking at the Medicare website on a laptop screen
Health Lab

Many older adults make Medicare decisions quickly and most don’t change plans, poll finds

Sixty percent of older adults spend less than an hour choosing their Medicare coverage during Open Enrollment, a new poll finds.