Investment in free follow up colonoscopies will pay off

Even if removing the cost barrier only moves the needle a little, it will save money and years of life for people with both Medicare and private insurance

5:00 AM

Author | Kara Gavin

graphic drawing of colonoscopy scan with large intestine vials patient on bed doctor
Getty Images

Ever since the start of 2023, most Americans over age 45 have had a new health insurance benefit: the ability to get a follow up colonoscopy at no cost to them, if a test of their stool suggests signs of potential colorectal cancer.

This coverage from both Medicare and private insurance, required by law, seeks to encourage more people to get screened in the first place, by starting with a stool test if they prefer.

But it also seeks to increase the percentage of people who follow up on a troubling result, by keeping out-of-pocket costs from getting in the way.

Before this provision took effect, nearly half of people in the eligible group of people age 45 to 75 didn’t get any sort of colorectal cancer screening – whether through a stool sample test or a colonoscopy.

That’s even though the initial screening hasn’t cost eligible patients anything for more than a decade.

And nearly half of those who did get screened via a stool test, and had signs of trouble, didn’t go for a follow up colonoscopy to look for signs of cancer and remove potentially cancerous polyps.

The rates of screening tended to be lower, and lack of follow up higher, among people with lower incomes and people of color.

Now, a pair of studies suggests that the benefit will save people money and potentially extend their lives through early detection and treatment – but it will also lead to financial savings for both Medicare and private insurers, even though they’ll be paying for more people to receive both initial screening tests and follow up colonoscopies when needed.

That’s true even if the removal of the follow up cost barrier only leads to small gains in the number of people getting screening colonoscopies or stool-based screening tests with follow up colonoscopies.

The findings are published in the journal Cancer Research Communications and the journal Population Health Management by a team led by A. Mark Fendrick, M.D., director of the University of Michigan Center for Value Based Insurance Design.

"These findings estimating that those who undergo follow up colonoscopy have better colorectal cancer-related outcomes and lower total medical expenditures, compared with those who don’t undergo follow up, should compel stakeholders to further invest in patient education, navigation, transportation, and other support services that facilitate completion of the colorectal cancer screening process," said Fendrick, a professor of internal medicine at the U-M Medical School and member of the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.

SEE ALSO: Follow up costs can add up if a free cancer screening shows a potential problem

The larger the percentage increase in screening, follow up, or both, the more the savings for individuals and the Medicare system, the researchers find.

But even a 5% increase in both behaviors will have this effect.

Medicare will save more than $4,700, and private insurance will save as much as $6,400, in the lifetime costs for every patient who gets a follow up colonoscopy after a positive stool test, the research shows.

That’s even though each follow up colonoscopy costs private insurance more than $2,000 and Medicare more than $1,100.

The studies were funded by, and Fendrick is a consultant to, a company called Exact Sciences, which makes a specific type of stool-based screening test. Several of the authors are employees of the company. The funding arrangement ensured the authors’ independence in performing the research.

The studies used a validated modeling tool originally developed by the company using National Cancer Institute tools and data.

The study also modeled the potential impact of increasing colonoscopy and use of another type of stool-based screening test called FIT, which does not involve the company’s product.

“Given the strong evidence that patient outcomes are improved, and new data suggesting that completion of follow up colonoscopy can be cost-saving, navigation issues such as education, transportation and time off of work must be addressed, as well as the need to ensure adequate and equitable access to follow up colonoscopy,” added co-author David Lieberman, M.D., professor of medicine at the Oregon Health and Science University.

Screening colonoscopies and stool-based screening tests have been available at no cost to Medicare participants and to people with private insurance who meet current age criteria since the Affordable Care Act’s preventive services coverage took effect in 2011.

A federal regulation requiring coverage of follow up colonoscopy without consumer cost sharing was implemented for Medicare and commercial insurers in 2023.

Fendrick and colleagues’ previous work documenting the out-of-pocket costs of follow up colonoscopy paid by Medicare beneficiaries and commercially insured individuals helped inform the rule change from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that led to the new benefit that took effect this year.

Papers cited:

“Impact of Eliminating Cost-Sharing by Medicare Beneficiaries for Follow Up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test,” Cancer Research Communications. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0322

A Call to Action to Increase Uptake of Follow Up Colonoscopy After Initial Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening, Population Health Management. DOI:10.1089/pop.2023.0199


More Articles About:

Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Conditions Lab Tests Cancer Screening Preventative health and wellness Health Care Delivery, Policy and Economics Future Think Education Hospitals & Centers
Health Lab word mark overlaying blue cells

Health Lab

Explore thousands of health news & research stories by visiting the Health Lab homepage for more.

Media Contact

University Hospital at U-M Health in the spring with flowering trees in foreground and Survival Flight helicopter visible

Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe

Featured News & Stories

UMich Med Mosaic on blue background with colorful geometric shapes
UMich Med Mosaic

Beyond the White Coat: Disability, Neurodiversity and Advocacy in Medical School

In this episode of UMich Med Mosaic, host Mackenzie Kay sits down with medical students Jill Maudlin, Sarah Renberg and Bella Johnson to discuss their experiences as disabled and neurodivergent trainees at the University of Michigan Medical School. They reflect on the personal journeys that led them to medicine, the challenges and strengths that accompany living with disabilities and chronic health conditions and the importance of representation within the medical profession. The conversation explores how disability shapes their approaches to patient care, advocacy and teamwork, as well as the role of the Medical Students for Disability Health Advocacy (MSDHA) organization in creating community and advancing accessibility initiatives. They also discuss Michigan’s accommodations in medical education, efforts to improve disability-related curriculum content and the importance of building a culture where disabled and neurodivergent students can thrive.
Minding Memory with a microphone and a shadow of a microphone on a blue background
Minding Memory

Antipsychotic Use in Nursing Homes: Balancing Medication Safety, Policy, and Dementia Care

In this episode, Lauren Gerlach and Matt Davis speak with Theresa Shireman, PhD, Director of the Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research and a Professor of Health Services, Policy and Practice and Epidemiology at the Brown University School of Public Health. Dr. Shireman’s research focuses on pharmaceutical policy, pharmacoepidemiology, health services research, and medication use among vulnerable populations. Dr. Shireman discusses her recent study, "Impact of Federal Antipsychotic Use Policy in Nursing Homes on New Diagnoses for Approved Indications in Dementia Residents," published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. The study examines whether federal policies designed to reduce antipsychotic use in nursing homes were associated with increases in new diagnoses of conditions, such as schizophrenia, that exclude residents from publicly report antipsychotic quality measures. Using an interrupted time-series design, the researchers examined changes following the 2012 National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care and the 2015 addition of antipsychotic use to the Nursing home Five-Star Quality Rating System. They found that neither policy was associated with an increase in new exclusionary diagnossees, challenging concerns that nursing homes were increasingly assigning these diagnoses to circumvent restrictions on antipsychotic use. The conversation also explores the benefits and risks of antipsychotic medications for people living with dementia, including the potential for serious adverse effects such as sedation, falls, stroke, and increased mortality. Dr. Shireman discusses how public reporting and financial incentives can influence prescribing practices,the limitations of using a single quality measure to evaluate nursing home care, and the importance of balancing medication safety and residents’ individual needs. The discussion highlights the need for shared decision-making among clinicians, nursing home staff, residents, and families, as well as greater investment in staffing, resources, and nonpharmacological approaches to improve quality of life for people living with dementia. The transcript for this episode can be found here.
A hand holding a prescription bottle with a dollar bill in it
Health Lab

Top 7 tips for choosing Medicare prescription drug coverage for 2027

Prescription drug coverage through Medicare Advantage and Part D plans in traditional Medicare has changed for 2027, and older adults may not know about programs that could help with costs.
Well-Being at Michigan Medicine with Dr. Elizabeth Harry
Well-Being at Michigan Medicine

Learning Together: Making Space for Growth at Work

What if well-being starts with how we learn together? On this episode of Well-Being at Michigan Medicine, Elizabeth Harry, M.D., is joined by Rajesh Mangrulkar, M.D., FNAP, Executive Director of U-M’s Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education (IPE), Executive Director of Michigan Medicine RISE (Research. Innovation. Scholarship. Education), and primary care physician of internal medicine whose work focuses on organizational leadership and innovation, and Johnny McGraw, M.A., Marketing & Communications Specialist for both RISE and IPE, about building teams through human connection, psychological safety and learning. They discuss a meeting practice, why leaders shape culture and how investments in collaboration can help health care teams work without asking people to carry everything alone.
Two older women looking at the Medicare website on a laptop screen
Health Lab

Many older adults make Medicare decisions quickly and most don’t change plans, poll finds

Sixty percent of older adults spend less than an hour choosing their Medicare coverage during Open Enrollment, a new poll finds.
Graphic of parents stressed about bills
Health Lab

4 in 5 parents say having a baby is too expensive

Four in five parents say it costs too much to have a baby, according to the University of Michigan Health C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health.